> -----Original Message----- > From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 6:55 AM > To: Myles Watson > Cc: Coreboot > Subject: Re: [coreboot] Serengeti dts > > On 29.10.2008 22:23, Myles Watson wrote: > > I'm running with a very minimalized dts (attached) to try to get to the > > point where a device gets matched correctly and disabled. I think > devices > > that should be disabled are causing me grief in SimNOW. > > > > This is a snippet of the log file that has me wondering what I'm doing > > wrong: > > > > PCI: pci_scan_bus pci_probe_dev returns dev 0x00000000(None (not found)) > > PCI: devfn 0x8 > > pci_scan_get_dev: list is 0x000ce8bc, *list is 0x00000000 > > PCI: pci_scan_bus pci_scan_get_dev returns dev None (no dev in tree yet) > > new_device: devcnt 14 > > find_device_operations: check all_device_operations[i] 0x0000d7a0 > > find_device_operations: cons 0x0000d7a0, cons id PCI: 1022:0001 > > find_device_operations: check all_device_operations[i] 0x0000d800 > > find_device_operations: cons 0x0000d800, cons id APIC_CLUSTER: 1022:1100 > > find_device_operations: check all_device_operations[i] 0x0000d860 > > find_device_operations: cons 0x0000d860, cons id PCI: 1022:1100 > > find_device_operations: check all_device_operations[i] 0x0000dc80 > > find_device_operations: cons 0x0000dc80, cons id PCI: 1022:7460 > > find_device_operations: check all_device_operations[i] 0x0000dc20 > > find_device_operations: cons 0x0000dc20, cons id PCI: 1022:7462 > > find_device_operations: match > > PCI: 01:01.0 id PCI: 1022:7462 ops > > PCI: 01:01.0 [PCI: 1022:7462] enabled > > PCI: pci_scan_bus pci_probe_dev returns dev 0x00012c70(dynamic PCI: > 01:01.0) > > Not a multi function device, or the device is not present. Skip to next > > device. > > > > Even though there's a match, a new device got created (dynamic PCI: > 01:01.0) > > > > Because of that, the enabled flag gets lost. > > > > You can't fix that in the dts. It's a code bug. I had a fix for the old > device tree code, but forward porting will takes some time. I hope to > create a working version over the weekend.
I'd love to hear the general idea, even before I see the patch. I'm surprised that you think the problem is in the device tree code. Thanks, Myles -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot