On 15.05.2009 17:35, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Use chipaddr_t instead of volatile uint8_t * because when we access
> chips in external flashers, they are not accessed via pointers at all.
> [...]
>
> Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net>
>   

The original patch does not apply anymore due to some refactoring I did
in nic3com.c. This patch is affected by some code moves, but apart from
that, the new patch is identical.
If someone wants a new patch, I can post it to the list.

Reviews of the original patch are still appreciated.

Regards,
Carl-Daniel

-- 
http://www.hailfinger.org/


-- 
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to