On 15.05.2009 17:35, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Use chipaddr_t instead of volatile uint8_t * because when we access > chips in external flashers, they are not accessed via pointers at all. > [...] > > Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> >
The original patch does not apply anymore due to some refactoring I did in nic3com.c. This patch is affected by some code moves, but apart from that, the new patch is identical. If someone wants a new patch, I can post it to the list. Reviews of the original patch are still appreciated. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot