On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Peter Stuge <pe...@stuge.se> wrote: > Myles Watson wrote: > > > Compilation of amd:db800 is still broken > > > Compilation of digitallogic:msm800sev is still broken > > > > These boards build for me and have 64K left in the ROM. How can > > there be that big of a difference between my build system and this > > one? > > I don't know. > > > > Anybody know why they have 128K bootblocks? It seems a little > > large. > > I just talked to Patrick about this on IRC - the second numeric > parameter is legacy only, it's not used for reserving space. >
./cbfs/cbfstool ./coreboot.rom create 262144 131072 ./coreboot.rom.bootblock ./cbfs/cbfstool ./coreboot.rom add-stage normal/coreboot_ram normal/coreboot_ram ... ./coreboot.rom: 256 kB, bootblocksize 131072, romsize 262144, offset 0x0 Alignment: 64 bytes Name Offset Type Size normal/coreboot_ram 0x0 stage 31764 fallback/coreboot_ram 0x7c80 stage 31765 0xf900 null 67256 The bootblock is 128K because normal/coreboot.rom and fallback/coreboot.rom are each 64K. It seems larger than necessary, but it shouldn't matter becuase there's still almost 64K left. Thanks, Myles
-- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot