ron minnich wrote: > >>> - memcpy(rec_dest, rec_src, rec_src->size); > >>> + memcpy(rec_dest, &option_table, sizeof(option_table)); > > completely changes the behavior of the code and is wrong. > > I'm willing to be convinced. But sizeof(option_table) is 8
How can that be?
option_table is the long unsigned char [] = { ... } in the source.
//Peter
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
