On 2/5/10 5:23 PM, ron minnich wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:12 AM, bifferos <biffe...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > >> cpu_khz gets exposed as a global, so it's going to be very difficult >> to support CPUs without TSC, without changing the mechanisms some >> payloads use to do timing. If you don't have TSC, then cpu_khz is >> largely irrelevant, but FILO accesses it directly. >> > > There's no way to just make it relevant? Can't a non-TSC CPU support > something meaningful in that variable? > (I don't know,just asking) > FILO uses this for its timeouts in various places. If there is a better way to do what FILO does, FILO should be fixed
-- coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br. Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613 Email: i...@coresystems.de • http://www.coresystems.de/ Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg • HRB 7656 Geschäftsführer: Stefan Reinauer • Ust-IdNr.: DE245674866 -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot