Stefan Reinauer wrote: > > The alternative would be to move all reset functions out of board > > code into chipset code. Maybe that's actually feasible? > > Yes, I start believing reset code belongs into the southbridge, > because the southbridge decodes cf9.
Makes sense. > But that's good for another day. Patrick has done incredible work > on simplifying coreboot, Yes indeed. > let's go one step at once. Fair. :) //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
