Am 16.03.2010 12:57, schrieb Peter Stuge: > Haha, wow, that really looks, interesting.. Not at all saying there's > any better way. Main advantage: a single rule that covers gcc invocations
Main disadvantage: Three levels of variable expansion ($, $$, $$$$) Given that few people need to touch this, I considered the trade-off to be okay. >> - Report build of failover.inc and romstage.inc > > Are these built into assembly files? Are those files named .S? > What does .inc mean? Maybe they really should be called .S, as that's what they are. We use .inc by convention for assembly files that are supposed to be _inc_luded into some larger form (mostly by crt0_includes.h) >> Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <[email protected] > > Acked-by: Peter Stuge <[email protected]> Thanks, r5224 Patrick -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
