Patrick Georgi wrote:
I'd be really amazed if they'd add another chip (that actually costs
money) and then only implement an incomplete protection scheme with it.
Yes it's surprising, but Gigabyte does add another flash device. They
also appear to rely on security by obscurity.
I'm trying to find out if some of the SuperIO and EC registers are under
some super secret NDA. Since some of the registers used are not even in
the NDA versions of the docs.
-Bari
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot