> > SeaBIOS is not slow - it is smaller than filo (both compressed and > uncompressed) and loads and initializes faster than filo. During one > of my tests, SeaBIOS was 1.5 seconds faster to the boot menu than > filo. >
I didn't mean SeaBIOS is slow. I meant loading it from disk would be slower than loading it from Flash. But from other replies I see there is not much of a use case for that. -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
