Hi, Am 25.09.2010 00:50, schrieb Peter Stuge: > Patrick Georgi wrote: >> attached patch uses the __DATE__ and __TIME__ macros instead of date(1) >> calls. User visible results are: >> - different date format (no timezone included) > > Ok.
Maybe use a date format which is closer to ISO 8601? > date +"%F %T" 2010-09-25 15:39:41 > date +"%FT%T" 2010-09-25T15:39:43 ( http://www.uic.edu/depts/accc/software/isodates/datefmt.html#Wanted ) Greetings, Frieder -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
