On 10/17/10 12:40 AM, Rudolf Marek wrote: > Hi all, > > Scott, thanks on working on that! The resource overlap is bit pitty - > it belongs to style - "Oh I haven't thought of that". I think this was heavily discussed a while back, and lead to some naughty work arounds in the i945 code. because having such big a "hole" lead to no resources being placed after the MMCONF area. Ther should be a better way to do it. Have to admit I have not particularly checked out the k8t890 code yet. My experiments with allocating a resource for it in the i945 northbridge code didn't keep the resource allocator from putting other stuff on top of it, mainly because of the hierarchical way the resource allocator works. Any insights are highly welcome.
Stefan -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot