On 02/02/2011 09:50 PM, Patrick Georgi wrote: > Am 02.02.2011 20:39, schrieb Alex G.: >>> coreboot is GPLv2, not GPLv2+ >> http://www.coreboot.org/Development_Guidelines says GPLv2+. >> So which is the correct license? > We have some GPLv2 and some GPLv2+ files, so the combined work is GPLv2. > As for the files that you added licensing information to, the licensing > is really a matter of the authors. > The only license we can safely apply is the GPLv2. > Thanks! That sheds some light on the matter. :)
Alex -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
