On 04/03/13 23:21, Andrew Goodbody wrote:
On 04/03/13 20:46, Andrew Basterfield wrote:
On 03/03/13 16:48, Andrew Goodbody wrote:
You say it is stable with one CPU using the Tyan BIOS so it is at least
possible to use the board as is.
There is certainly code in the S2895 devtree and mptable to allow for
the missing devices caused by a missing 2nd CPU but I have no idea how
well tested that is. How does it behave if you boot with ACPI disabled?
Andrew
Hi
It is much much better with ACPI disabled for the kernel; debian boots,
I get SATA and USB although no onboard ethernet.
Looking at the two boot logs, the PCI resources allocated are very
different. My big worry is about the reported differences on the IRQs in
use. I'm not sure what more help I can be. I doubt that the missing CPU
is affecting things too much, I just think that this board support code
simply needs fixing. It would be helpful if anyone knew of any previous
revision where it used to work?
Did you try Carl-Daniel's suggestion of booting with 2GB or less?
Andrew
Hi
I have tried with 1GB and ACPI enabled and I got the same symptoms as
all the RAM and ACPI enabled; i.e. it didn't help
thanks
Andrew
--
coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
