On 12/13/2013 11:35 PM, Gabe Black wrote: > Defaults should work. Why should I have to know about a magic option > that will make my computer not crash at random? If you don't want your > computer to work that badly, you should also be motivated enough to find > the magic switch that will break it. Breaking people by default in > mysterious and unpredictable ways is a terrible idea. > And defaults work. They will continue to work.
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:33 PM, mrnuke <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 12/13/2013 11:30 PM, Gabe Black wrote: > > Processors which need microcode updates? > > > And how are we breaking them when the defaults don't change? You already > have the option, today, to not include microcode updates. It's just not > on by default. > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:28 PM, mrnuke <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > On 12/13/2013 11:24 PM, Gabe Black wrote: > > > If you don't want to hear it, ignore it. We shouldn't break > things > > just > > > so people with mistaken opinions are happy, nor how long it > took to > > > rearrange things into a broken state. > > > > > What exactly are we breaking? > > > > > > -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
