ron minnich wrote: > > That sounds like upstream has failed completely. > > there is a delta in time between when it is working in > the chromium repo and it makes it to upstream. .. > We've always had this situation. It's not new.
That just means that we haven't improved in a very long time. :\ > It's just plain wrong to characterize this as a failure. I disagree. I do think it means that the project isn't fitting its contributors so well. Note that I am explicitly not saying and not thinking that it is a failure of any contributor. If the project could change to work somehow differently and that would help contributors then I think that's something we should consider identifying and doing. > It's a natural consequence of the fact that companies can't always > immediately push all their work upstream. What's the difference from Linux kernel development again? > Expecting anything else is unrealistic. I don't think expectations are too usefule but I think it's what we should strive towards? //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot