On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 8:31 AM Aaron Durbin <adur...@google.com> wrote:
> > I personally feel that changing device_t type based on stage makes the > code non-obvious and hard to follow. > > I'd rather we *always* provide simple u32 device_t functions in all > stages while allowing struct device IO functions for use in ramstage. > > that's pretty much the approach I tried to take in v3. While the device_t stuff is cool it's too hard for my brain. BUT, it's there, been in use for a long time, not sure this is the best time to change it. But The Will of the People will decide. ron
-- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
