I don't think it's really very similar at all. The bootblock output can change drastically based on Kconfig settings. Am I missing something?
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Nico Huber <nic...@gmx.de> wrote: > On 23.10.2015 18:32, Martin Roth wrote: >>> So, is there a third option that I'm missing? Other opinions? >>>>> The third option would be a plain text format which is easy to parse >>>>> but still covers the spec well. >> >> I'd say that we should store the SPDs as binaries - these are easy to >> use at build time, and there's no reason to build them every time. >> They change, but infrequently. Then we need a better tool. > That would also apply to a bootblock that needs a specific assembler or > romcc. Would you distribute that as a binary too? > > Nico -- coreboot mailing list: coreboot@coreboot.org http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot