I have make quiet some mistake on coding style before and had been point out several times on review :-). I still fell like an automatic formatting can help myself and new comers.
Ron Minnich via coreboot <coreboot@coreboot.org> 于2019年3月27日周三 上午10:03写道： > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:13 AM Patrick Georgi <pgeo...@google.com> wrote: > > > > Am Di., 19. März 2019 um 21:53 Uhr schrieb Julius Werner < > jwer...@chromium.org>: > > > I'm not really a fan of auto-formatters because they can just never be > > > as good as a human in all cases. > > As I understand Ron's argument, the idea is to accept being "less > > good" than any single expert person, because it's traded in for more > > consistency and less friction over everything code formatting since > > the Machine Is Right[tm]. > > I repeat Rob Pike's comment: > "nobody likes the output of the Go formatter, everyone likes the Go > formatter" > > meaning that while the output doesn't always meet everyone's standard > of perfection, it removes the arguments based on people's different > ideas of what is good. And, plus, none of you agree with me or even > each other in ALL cases on what "looks good", so at some point these > arguments boil down to "because I like it." > > I watched this roll out in the Go community in 2011 or so. gofmt was > required. There were lots of arguments. In the end, people realized > that it was nice to delegate formatting to a robot, because these > arguments get exhausting. > > Nobody now remembers a time when robots did not format Go code. Nobody > wants to go back. > > This is true of many projects, in particular those using Rust or Go. > > ron > _______________________________________________ > coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org > To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org >
_______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org
