Hi Ivan, On 15.05.19 17:11, Ivan Ivanov wrote:
Funny vuln names! Luckily AMD (as usual?) is not affected... As someone wrote at the forums, a hidden price for Intel higher performance is a holey pants, just for 120 fps in games instead of 110 :P Neglecting security for the purpose of performing slightly better by skipping various checks inside CPU to improve the latencies, - is both unfair competition and scamming a consumer, since eventually he's getting significantly less performance than what he paid for
I'm curious. Did you do or know somebody who did as much research on AMD processors, as was necessary to find these vulnerabilities? If not, how can you make such comparisons? Nico _______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org
