On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 8:13 AM Jorge Fernandez Monteagudo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Marshall > > >* amd/bettong removal, should it happen, triggers CarrizoPI (00660F01) > >removal > > > >We ought to have all the backward-compatibility for CZ and the Embedded > >variants landed in stoneyridge and amd_blobs now. I think it should be a > >fairly easy changeover for amd/bettong from cpu/nb/sb to soc/amd > >/stoneyridge if someone is able to spend the time on it. The older 0060F01 > >AGESA was superseded years ago by StoneyPI, and has practically no chance of > >ever being updated again. Padmelon may be the preferred >board now but I > >believe there are likely still Bettongs in the field. > > I would like to try to do the modifications to avoid bettong removal. I'll > have some time this Xmas holidays to spend on it. > But I'm still struggling with the minimal changes to be able to generate a > board_status report because no commits I've done > are merged. I don't know exactly how to proceed to avoid deprecation... >
AMD is not valueing my work or fulfilling their part of the agreements, so I am leaving these size 13 shoes behind for someone to fill. From what I know, the only persons I could recommend for further binaryPI related reviews are not being for these tasks either. Regards, Kyösti Mälkki _______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
