https://youtu.be/qpMvS1Q1sos

I'm sorry. :(


On 6/10/21 7:47 am, Matt B wrote:
My concern is more about surprise brokenness when trying to use the newest version, if any of those pentiums remain.

On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 4:06 PM ron minnich <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    That's what versions are all about. It seems sensible to me to leave
    the old bad stuff behind; if people need it, it's all still there if
    they know the tag.

    On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 1:02 PM Matt B <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    >
    > I should note I'm not 100% sure what they're doing there.
    >
    > Are there any more of these buggy pentiums left in the coreboot
    tree? (If he chooses to update) I can imagine RMS getting real
    snippy if we break his thinkpad. :P
    >
    > On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 3:53 PM ron minnich <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    >>
    >> nice fine. Might be worth adding the text of this comment
    (modified as
    >> needed) to the CL so that in years to come people understand the
    >> reasons.
    >>
    >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 12:51 PM Matt B
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    wrote:
    >> >
    >> > A quick google turned this up:
    >> >
    
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.0/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c#253
    
<https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/chromeos-3.0/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c#253>
    >> >
    >> > On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 4:06 AM Julian Stecklina
    <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    >> >>
    >> >> On Tue, 2021-10-05 at 09:29 +0300, Kyösti Mälkki wrote:
    >> >> > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 8:12 PM Julian Stecklina
    >> >> > <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
    >> >> > >
    >> >> > > But it looks like the workaround was just carried
    forward with no discussion
    >> >> > > of
    >> >> > > whether it's still necessary or what it actually works
    around.
    >> >> > >
    >> >> >
    >> >> > Hi
    >> >> >
    >> >> > Removal has been suggested with the X2APIC work:
    >> >> >
    >> >> > https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55199
    <https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55199>
    >> >> >
    >> >>
    >> >> I've been looking at 4.13 instead of master. My bad. In
    master, indeed most
    >> >> atomic accesses are gone and the ones writing to ICR are
    left. This mostly makes
    >> >> sense and is much clearer now. :)
    >> >>
    >> >> Thanks,
    >> >> Julian
    >> >>
    >> >> _______________________________________________
    >> >> coreboot mailing list -- [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    >> >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    >> >
    >> > _______________________________________________
    >> > coreboot mailing list -- [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    >> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > coreboot mailing list -- [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>


_______________________________________________
coreboot mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
coreboot mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to