On 28.11.21 19:54, Nico Huber wrote: > Oh, and I almost forgot, the board ports don't look like coreboot code. > There's CamelCase, odd tables in C code (as if there was no devicetree), > AGESA configuration done in the code of each and every mainboard that > should be done only once in the chipset code... IMHO it looks like a > mess. When one is used to coreboot and then sees this, there should > be no doubt why we have deprecation squabbles ;) This [1] might be > related. Board ports of other platforms have seen a lot of updates > over the last ten years, that's not easy for ports where one doesn't > know what to begin with.
Looks like I forgot the ref here. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broken_windows_theory _______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org
