Haha... I watched that talk and I was just typing the question "Were you using any U-Boot UEFI design principles in the RunDXERun project?" I'll have to go through that again to take some notes :)
On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 12:12 AM ron minnich <rminn...@gmail.com> wrote: > gotcha. Makes sense to use the UEFI code from u-boot as a payload. > > note that I used that code to tell me how to write rundxerun, > https://talks.osfc.io/osfc2021/talk/VSPKZG/, it's very readable ;-) > > ron > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 10:27 AM Ahamed Husni <ahamedhusn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > + Simon Glass > > > > The current U-Boot payload in coreboot supports UEFI. > > In the UEFI working group meeting there was a suggestion to take just > > the UEFI code from U-Boot and build our own payload for coreboot. > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 11:41 PM ron minnich <rminn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> so is your plan to port the UEFI code as a payload or to use u-boot > >> as a payload and then use their UEFI support? > >> > >> On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 9:36 AM Ahamed Husni <ahamedhusn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi everyone, > >> > > >> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 4:21 PM Ahamed Husni <ahamedhusn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > Dear All, > >> > > > >> > > I am hoping to apply for the GSoC 2022 program. I am really > interested in contributing to the coreboot project as I love to work with > low level development. > >> > > > >> > > I completed the pre-requisites mentioned in the documentation. > >> > > > >> > > I built a 32-bit EFI binary in the gnu-efi environment. I used > U-Boot as the payload for coreboot to test this EFI binary. The target is > x86_64(QEMU). > >> > > Serial output: > https://gist.github.com/drac98/6166d29f6c3a2baf2f4e791925ea98d3 > >> > > > >> > > I sent a patch for review about a year ago related to adding > heap-out-of-bound detection support to AddressSanitizer port. If this is > not acceptable as my first patch for review, please let me know. I can fix > some coding styles or do a simple task given by the community. > >> > > PATCH: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/51787 > >> > > > >> > > I find the "Add U-BOOT's UEFI payload as a coreboot payload" > project mentioned in the coreboot project collection interesting to me. I > have no prior experience with UEFI. As a starting point I learned to build > and run an EFI binary with coreboot using the U-Boot payload. > >> > > > >> > > Please let me know what I should do next to learn and prepare for > this project. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks & Best regards, > >> > > Husni. > >> > > >> > I reached out to the U-Boot community to check the current status of > the UEFI. Please find the thread here: > https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2022-March/477682.html > >> > > >> > I have a few questions about the project. > >> > What should be the deliverables for this project? > >> > Do we need 64-bit EFI support (U-Boot doesn't support 64bit EFI)? > >> > How do we develop a payload? Is it done using libpayload? > >> > Is this a medium sized project or a large project? > >> > > >> > --Husni >
_______________________________________________ coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org
