Hi Arthur,
On 17.05.2022 16:47, Arthur Heymans wrote:
Hi
We spend more time debating whether to keep AGESA in the master branch
than actually reviewing code to maintains it.
Here are some patches series I would like to be tested & reviewed:
* Agesa was never properly linked and relied on default linker
behavior to append unmatched data. Here is the fix:
https://review.coreboot.org/q/topic:AGESA_DATA
<https://review.coreboot.org/q/topic:AGESA_DATA>
* Use MRC cache for non volatile data
https://review.coreboot.org/q/topic:AGESA_MRC_CACHE
<https://review.coreboot.org/q/topic:AGESA_MRC_CACHE>
* Use CLFLUSH to make sure code hits DRAM and incidently avoid
inconsistent MTRRs (bonus is compressed postcar stage):
https://review.coreboot.org/q/topic:compress_postcar
<https://review.coreboot.org/q/topic:compress_postcar>
Thank you for your efforts to make this code better. We (3mdeb) will
take a look at these patches in the upcoming days and provide feedback
and review.
Kind regards
Arthur
_______________________________________________
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org
Best regards,
--
Michał Żygowski
Firmware Engineer
GPG: 6B5BA214D21FCEB2
https://3mdeb.com | @3mdeb_com
_______________________________________________
coreboot mailing list -- coreboot@coreboot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to coreboot-le...@coreboot.org
