Issue #461 has been updated by Nicholas Chin.

akjuxr3 akjuxr3 wrote:
> Currently in case of the ability to run as less amount of closed source 
> software as possible and still have Microcode updates the reduced Intel ME 
> with disabled bit in IFD and the lga1155 or the mobile versions of those cpus 
> are the only option for x86_64 out there.
> The next cpu generation (Haswell) inside for example T440p and W541 require 
> the binary blob mrc.bin
> 
> Are there any plans of replacing the Haswell mrc.bin with free software? Or 
> have the x86_64 platform be given up when the goal is to run just free 
> software and the people should move to aarch64 or risc-v?

Already being worked on, refer to 
https://review.coreboot.org/q/topic:haswell-nri

----------------------------------------
Feature #461: Replacing Haswell mrc.bin blob with free software
https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/461#change-1424

* Author: akjuxr3 akjuxr3
* Status: New
* Priority: Normal
* Target version: none
* Start date: 2023-02-16
* Related links: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52659
----------------------------------------
Currently in case of the ability to run as less amount of closed source 
software as possible and still have Microcode updates the reduced Intel ME with 
disabled bit in IFD and the lga1155 or the mobile versions of those cpus are 
the only option for x86_64 out there.
The next cpu generation (Haswell) inside for example T440p and W541 require the 
binary blob mrc.bin

Are there any plans of replacing the Haswell mrc.bin with free software? Or 
have the x86_64 platform be given up when the goal is to run just free software 
and the people should move to aarch64 or risc-v?



-- 
You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, 
or are involved in it.
To change your notification preferences, please click here: 
https://ticket.coreboot.org/my/account
_______________________________________________
coreboot mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to