Pardon my confusing wording... I meant to say "We have had a number of users over the years who have made something like this work"
Long day and distractions while writing this! On Monday, May 16, 2016 at 9:31:42 PM UTC-7, Brian Harrington wrote: > > Prabhu, > > We have a number of users who over the users have made something like this > work. In these cases they're building the module from source. If this is > a driver for which you do not have any of the source code it will likely be > a challenge. > > > http://www.emergingstack.com/2016/01/10/Nvidia-GPU-plus-CoreOS-plus-Docker-plus-TensorFlow.html > https://github.com/Avalanche-io/coreos-nvidia > > http://tleyden.github.io/blog/2014/11/04/coreos-with-nvidia-cuda-gpu-drivers/ > > Traun (the gentleman who did the last post) has also done great work in > making Couchbase "cloud native" atop Kubernetes as well. > > In terms of having the background process talk to the kernel module, that > shouldn't be an issue. The most important piece will be to identify which > kernel capabilities are needed to do this ( > http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/capabilities.7.html). For the > container which will load the module it will need CAP_SYS_MODULE. For the > container running the SDK process you would be better equipped to answer > which capabilities are needed. > > Hope this helps! > > --Brian 'redbeard' Harrington > > > On Thursday, May 12, 2016 at 11:58:59 AM UTC-7, Prabhu Balakannan wrote: >> >> Experts, >> I would like to get inputs on enabling CoreOS on our networking device. >> We currently have networking device (Switch/Router) running proprietary >> OS. The current proprietary network OS we are running mainly interacts with >> hardware that contains switching and routing ASICs for programming >> perspective. >> We want to understand whether we can use CoreOS and include our KLM >> kernel module to control these devices in the hardware for programming and >> also we have a background SDK process that interacts with the KLM. Can the >> background SDK process run directly on CoreOS instead of container/docker? >> >> -thanks >> Prabhu. >> >
