kubectl get pods only return default namespace, kubectl get pods 
--all-namespaces show all the pods now. My bad and thanks for the help.

On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 11:34:48 AM UTC+8, Rob Szumski wrote:
>
> The Vagrant set up assumes you are using kubectl from the same machine 
> running Vagrant and references a bunch of generated TLS assets. You can see 
> which in the provided kubectl config file:
>
>
> https://github.com/coreos/coreos-kubernetes/blob/master/multi-node/vagrant/kubeconfig
>
> You should be able to take those assets and SCP them onto one of the 
> CoreOS nodes, along with the kubectl config. You maybe need to change that 
> IP address to your public IP. Run kubectl similar to:
>
> kubectl —kubeconfig=“/path/to/config"
>
> More advanced, you should be able to cross-compile the kubectl Go code 
> into a Windows binary. It might be worth opening an issue on the Kubernetes 
> repo asking for them to start Windows releases or possibly use one of these 
> community builds:
>
> https://github.com/eirslett/kubectl-windows
>
> If you did that and it still doesn’t show any pods, but you get no errors, 
> be sure you are looking at all namespaces:
>
> kubectl get pods --all-namespaces
>
> You should see an API server, a controller manager, proxies, etc.
>
>  - Rob
>
>
> On Jun 23, 2016, at 7:28 PM, tech qi3 <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi, i followed the guideline in coreos website to understand the setup of 
> kubernetes coreos multi-node with ssl clusters. It seems everything work 
> fine except when I used kubectl get pods and return nothing. Aren't it 
> suppose to show the kubernetes component's pods? since all the components 
> were created in pod inside the master node. But when i check with docker 
> ps, all containers is up and running and calico is running with rkt. Does 
> this have something to do with the wrapper sript or am i missing something 
> here? 
>
> By the way I setup all the nodes with vagrant. I install kubectl within 
> the master node instead of ssh from elsewhere since i am using windows.  
>
>
>

Reply via email to