On 03/10/2010 04:26 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 04:15:34PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > [...] >> Should patches go to bug-coreutils@, or is coreutils@ the preferred >> place now-a-days? Or does it depend on contents - bug fix patches >> to the former, and maint stuff like this to the latter? > > Patch submissions should probably go to coreutils-patches@ ;)
Which does not (yet?) exist. Do we want one? > > [...] >> --- a/.gitignore >> +++ b/.gitignore >> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ coreutils-*.tar.gz >> coreutils-*.tar.gz.sig >> coreutils-*.tar.lzma >> coreutils-*.tar.lzma.sig >> +coreutils-*.tar.xz >> +coreutils-*.tar.xz > > The second one should be read as coreutils-*.tar.xz.sig? Bah, you're right. Copy-n-paste strikes again, followed by hitting send before hitting save. -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
