On 10/21/2010 09:33 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Then, to get full seconds.nanoseconds, you'd use a format like %X.%:X
and if you want only milliseconds, you'd use %X.%3.3:X
Oops.
I forgot to zero-pad. Otherwise, with< 100,000,000ns in the first
case or< 100 in the 2nd, and the above would print invalid numbers.
This is the right way:
To get full seconds.nanoseconds, you'd use a format like %X.%0:X
and if you want only milliseconds, you'd use %X.%03.3:X
Do we really want to require that users must manually 0-pad, or can we
explicitly state that %:X has a minimum width of min(precision,9), and 0
padding is only needed if you want a width greater than 9.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
