Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 10/23/2012 01:13 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> Thanks. >> I confirmed that this addresses the problem. >> >> Did you consider other ways of addressing it, >> say without adding that cast? Imagine that >> someone adds another addmod2 use in this code... >> They will have to know to widen any argument that may >> be narrower than uintmax_t. > > I agree it's not ideal, > though I couldn't really come up with anything really clean, > since it's a mixture of assembly and C. > > I'd already pushed before I saw this comment.
No problem.
