On 15 July 2018 at 19:15, Pádraig Brady <[email protected]> wrote:
> An alternative would be to output '\n' in that case
> which wouldn't be as general, but would be easier to parse
> with existing tools.

Or have you considered using lslogins from util-linux? It gives a lot
of control what to print and how.

lslogins --logins=$USER,nobody --output=USER,GROUP,SUPP-GROUPS

-- 
Sami Kerola
http://www.iki.fi/kerolasa/

Reply via email to