On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 1:10 PM Jim Meyering <j...@meyering.net> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:40 PM Jim Meyering <j...@meyering.net> wrote: > ... > > - I'm inclined to work like the openbsd cksum and accept invocations > > like "cksum -a sha1x" and "cksum -a sha1b". Any objection? > > Actually, I am now **disinclined** to implement this part. It'd make > sense only if we were able to compute multiple checksums in a single > invocation. > Allowing that would require a fundamental redesign, which feels out of > scope, at least initially.
Here's a proposed patch for that.
cu-cksum-base64.diff
Description: Binary data
