Hi,
I am having problems with the evaluation/output order of 'du (GNU
coreutils) 8.32'.First tests below show that glob expansion of '*' and
language specific sorting work as expected. 'du' intrinsic sorting of
dirs is reverse order. Cumbersome, but follows manpage description.
But last tests show that there is no sorting for files.
I found general hints at the coreutils web resources regarding sorting
issues, but nothing regarding the combination of sorted glob expansion
with reverse dir sorting of 'du' or unsorted file order of 'du' output.
E.g. 'du -a *'
Of course post-processing the output, using a different command, or
writing a script could work around. But the beauty of 'du' is/always was
its simplicity (e.g. in 'watch' command).
In case other coreutil commands show the same behavior, why not to
introduce a '--sort'option, which applies the language specific sort
order refered to in 'LC_COREUTILS=...'? If LC_COREUTILS does not exist
or is "", then apply LC_ALL. If this does not exist or is empty, then
ignore '--sort'.
Actually, the sort order usually does not play a big role, as long as
*everything* is sorted the same way. It is the mixture that causes the
problem. If LC_COREUTILS does not fit the development strategy, would it
be possible to define an alias for 'du' and 'du -a', which is always
based on 'du *'? Unfortunately I am not experienced enough to find out
an expression, which works with all file / dir names and combinations of
'du' options.
Or is there a simple solution which I have missed?
Thank you for any response.
*Environment:**
*
LANGUAGE=
LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_ALL not set, but neither =C nor =POSIX had an impact.
LC_...=de_DE.UTF-8 (all others)
*Test Setup (mind the order):**
*
touch 2.txt
touch 1.txt
touch 3.txt
mkdir b
touch b/2b.txt
touch b/1b.txt
touch b/3b.txt
mkdir a
touch a/2a.txt
touch a/1a.txt
touch a/3a.txt
mkdir c
touch c/2c.txt
touch c/1c.txt
touch c/3c.txt
*Tests (sorted order as expected):**
*
ls
-----
1.txt 2.txt 3.txt a b c
ls -R
-----
.:
1.txt 2.txt 3.txt a b c
./a:
1a.txt 2a.txt 3a.txt
./b:
1b.txt 2b.txt 3b.txt
./c:
1c.txt 2c.txt 3c.txt
ls *
-----
1.txt 2.txt 3.txt
a:
1a.txt 2a.txt 3a.txt
b:
1b.txt 2b.txt 3b.txt
c:
1c.txt 2c.txt 3c.txt
du *
-----
0 1.txt
0 2.txt
0 3.txt
4 a
4 b
4 c
*Test (reverse order. Cumbersome, but as described in man page):
*
du
-----
4 ./c
4 ./b
4 ./a
*Test (file order not sorted at 1st and 2nd level):
*
du -a
-----
0 ./2.txt
0 ./c/3c.txt
0 ./c/2c.txt
0 ./c/1c.txt
4 ./c
0 ./1.txt
0 ./b/2b.txt
0 ./b/1b.txt
0 ./b/3b.txt
4 ./b
0 ./a/3a.txt
0 ./a/1a.txt
0 ./a/2a.txt
4 ./a
0 ./3.txt
*Test (1st level sorted. 2nd level files not sorted - identical to above):**
***
du -a *
-------
0 1.txt
0 2.txt
0 3.txt
0 a/3a.txt
0 a/1a.txt
0 a/2a.txt
4 a
0 b/2b.txt
0 b/1b.txt
0 b/3b.txt
4 b
0 c/3c.txt
0 c/2c.txt
0 c/1c.txt
4 c
