From: COSE <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Carsten Bormann <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tuesday 1 November 2016 at 22:48 To: Stephen Farrell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Jim Schaad <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 'Justin Richer' <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 'The IESG' <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [COSE] Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-cose-msg-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
On 1 November 2016 at 22:16:33, Stephen Farrell ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) wrote: Do we think there's a way to square this circle and somehow get rid of the appendix to get to a result folks can all use? The problem is that we need the capability outlined in the appendix. (Or, in other words, the problem is the MUST in the main body. This should be a “MUST unless the specific conditions defined in Appendix A apply”.) And, as mentioned, we actually don’t comply with the specific conditions in Appendix A . . . Göran
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
