Hi! Thank you for bringing the question back on the agenda! We think that these DNS scenarios could be useful application areas for C509. What kind of updates to the existing rfc:s do you see as needed? Maybe if you could present more details, the community could decide if the amendments are best provided as a separate draft, as something to include in the C509 draft, or as updates to some of the other existing documents.
Best Regards Joel Höglund On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 at 16:39, Robert Moskowitz <[email protected]> wrote: > I was late getting into the meeting, but... > > Back in July I brought up updating 4398 and 6698 to support ccert and > also some cbor raw keys. > > This would be helpful in work I am doing elsewhere. > > Do we include updates to those in this draft or do we make a special, > small draft to add this to these RR? > > Bob > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose >
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
