Hi Roman,

Now that the COSE charter has been updated to bring the TSA-TST
document in scope, I believe this DISCUSS could be cleared.

cheers, thanks!

On Fri, 2 May 2025 at 17:33, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter-05: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to 
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-tsa-tst-header-parameter/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> For the responsible AD and WG chairs -- this document is not in scope for the
> current WG charter.  My understanding of its substance is that it defines two,
> new COSE attributes.  The approved -03 charter explicitly says:
>
> “The WG will produce documents for new attributes only if they are in the
> list of deliverables below. A re-charter will be required to expand that list.
> The WG is expected as part of normal processing to review and comment on
> attributes that are not in charter but are of general public interest.”
>
> There is no subsequent reference to work about specifying timestamp related
> attributes in the work items section of the charter (or any other place).
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thank you to Linda Dunbar for the GENART review.
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
COSE mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to