Hi! Is the “new” one from "8.1.3.2. AKP Private Key”. It’s the one I don’t see in the registries.
spt > On Jul 22, 2025, at 01:00, David Dong via RT > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Goran, Derek, Sean, > > Just a ping for this; I understand its IETF week. > > Could you review the registration request below from Mike Jones? This is a > follow-up to the prior registration request, now for the remaining > registrations in the document. > > Please note that this document is in IETF Last Call as well. > > Registry: https://www.iana.org/assignments/cose > Document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-cose-dilithium-08 > > The due date for this request would be July 31st. > > Best regards, > > David Dong > IANA Services Sr. Specialist > > On Thu Jul 10 20:22:07 2025, david.dong wrote: >> Hi Goran, Derek, Sean, >> >> Could you review the registration request below from Mike Jones? This >> is a follow-up to the prior registration request, now for the >> remaining registrations in the document. >> >> Please note that this document is in IETF Last Call as well. >> >> Registry: https://www.iana.org/assignments/cose >> Document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-cose- >> dilithium-08 >> >> The due date for this request would be July 31st. >> >> Best regards, >> >> David Dong >> IANA Services Sr. Specialist >> >> On Tue Jul 08 17:59:13 2025, [email protected] wrote: >>> Dear IANA, >>> >>> Now that https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-dilithium/ >>> has been submitted to the IESG for publication, I'm writing as COSE >>> chair to request early allocation of the remaining registry entries >>> requested in the specification. Recall that the early allocations >>> requested in the message below were performed under [IANA #1416863]. >>> >>> The additional values to allocate are in the sections: >>> >>> * 8.1.3.2. <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose- >>> dilithium-08.html#section-8.1.3.2> AKP Private >>> Key<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose-dilithium- >>> 08.html#name-akp-private-key> >>> * 8.1.6.2. <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose- >>> dilithium-08.html#section-8.1.6.2> AKP Private >>> Key<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose-dilithium- >>> 08.html#name-akp-private-key-2> >>> >>> Thank you, >>> -- Mike >>> >>> From: Michael Jones >>> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2025 2:16 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Deb Cooley <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Request for early allocation of values defined in draft- >>> ietf- >>> cose-dilithium >>> >>> Dear IANA, >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-dilithium/ defines >>> identifiers needed for interoperable use of the post-quantum ML-DSA >>> signature algorithm defined by NIST. Implementers are waiting on the >>> code point allocations in this draft to be able to produce >>> interoperable implementations using this algorithm. The draft has >>> completed WGLC and publication has been requested. >>> >>> I am writing as a COSE working group chair requesting that early >>> allocation be performed for these values defined by the >>> specification: >>> All values defined in the IANA Considerations section at >>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose-dilithium- >>> 06.html#name-iana-considerations EXCEPT FOR the private key and seed >>> values in Sections 8.1.4, 8.1.6, 8.1.9.1, and 8.1.9.3. (The private >>> key and seed representations are still being discussed in >>> coordination >>> with the Lamps working group, and may change.) >>> >>> This action has support from both COSE chairs (Ivo and Mike) and the >>> COSE area director (Paul). >>> >>> Thank you, >>> -- Mike >
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
