I don't think that this document fits into the COSE charter.
lawrence reilly <[email protected]> wrote: > My name is Lawrence John Reilly Jr., and I’ve authored an > Internet-Draft on the Reilly EternaMark (REM) Protocol: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-reilly-rem-protocol-00.html > The REM Protocol establishes digital permanence using DOI archiving + > blockchain timestamping. Proof artifacts already exist as live DOIs, > hashes, and TXIDs. I’m exploring how such artifacts might be packaged > using COSE receipts/envelopes for interoperability. > Would the group be open to providing feedback on applicability or fit? > Best regards, L.J. Reilly > ---------------------------------------------------- > Alternatives: > ---------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- > [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ COSE mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
