On Mar 11, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Kevin Horn wrote:

> I am in the process of implementing cosign for a client, and have  
> run into a nasty roadblock.
>
> I have 2 environments, 1 development and 1 production.  Everything  
> work fine on the dev machine, but on the production box, when  
> logging into the cosign CGIs, I get back a HTTP 500 error.
>
> Of course I went to the logs and came up with the following:
> /var/log/system.log:Mar 11 11:13:22 SANITIZEDcosignd [76]: debug:  
> STARTTLS 2

How does SANTIZEDcosignd differ from a standard build of cosignd?

> /var/log/system.log:Mar 11 11:13:32 www cosign.cgi[9132]: ***  
> NSInvocation: warning: object 0x1000d1040 of class 'ReplicaFile'  
> does not implement methodSignatureForSelector: -- trouble ahead
> /var/log/system.log:Mar 11 11:13:32 www cosign.cgi[9132]: ***  
> NSInvocation: warning: object 0x1000d1040 of class 'ReplicaFile'  
> does not implement doesNotRecognizeSelector: -- abort

Very strange. NSInvocation is a Cocoa Objective-C object. The  
cosign.cgi shouldn't have any references to it, but for some reason it  
(or a framework it's linked against) is aborting (which causes it to  
dump core) because 0x1000d1040 is a bad object. In fact 0x1000d1040  
shouldn't be an object at all, because cosign.cgi isn't written in an  
object-oriented language, unless you've modified the code.

Can you send your config.log and the crashlog? If you've got a core,  
that'd be useful, too.

andrew

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Cosign-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cosign-discuss

Reply via email to