---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: the physics arXiv blog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:02 PM
Subject: the physics arXiv blog
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


   the physics arXiv blog <http://arxivblog.com/>

Cloaking objects at a
distance<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/arXivblog/~3/443220774/>

Posted: 05 Nov 2008 07:14 AM CST

[image: 
cloaking-at-a-distance.jpg]<http://arxivblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/cloaking-at-a-distance.jpg>

One of the disadvantages of invisibility cloaks is that anything placed
inside one is automatically blinded, since no light can get in.

Now Yun Lai and colleagues from The Hong Kong University of Science and
Technology have come up with a way round this using the remarkable idea of
cloaking at a distance. This involves using a "complementary material" to
hide an object outside it.

Here's the idea: complementary materials are designed to have a permittivity
and permeability that are complementary to the values in a nearby region of
space. "Complementary" means that the values cancel out the effect that that
this region of space has on a plane lightwave passing through. To an
observer, that region of space simply vanishes.

Cloaking a region of space is relatively straightforward but cloaking an
object in that space is another matter. Lai and co say the trick is to work
out the optical properties of the object and then embed the "complementary
image" within the cloaking material. So a plane wave would be bent by the
object but then bent back into a plane as it passes through the cloaking
material.
Et voila: cloaking at a distance. And in a way that doesn't leave the
cloaked object blind.

Of course , creating the complementary materials necessary to do this trick
is another matter. And the usual caveats apply: it works only at a single
frequency in 2D. But cloaking, in theory at least, is looking more
interesting by the day.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0811.0458: A Complementary Media Invisibility Cloak that
can Cloak Objects at a Distance Outside the Cloaking Shell

<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/arXivblog?a=N1IXd9>
 <http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=xSF1N>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=KzjbN>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=6rabn>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=fARxN>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=SADAn>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=9LeaN>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=kTikn>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/arXivblog?a=nWujN>
  You are subscribed to email updates from the physics arXiv
blog<http://arxivblog.com/>
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe
now<http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailunsub?id=15869139&key=eQzP6HIJAu>
. Email Delivery powered by FeedBurner Inbox too full? [image:
(feed)]<http://feeds.feedburner.com/arXivblog>
Subscribe <http://feeds.feedburner.com/arXivblog> to the feed version of the
physics arXiv blog in a feed reader. If you prefer to unsubscribe via postal
mail, write to: the physics arXiv blog, c/o FeedBurner, 20 W Kinzie, 9th
Floor, Chicago IL USA 60610

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cosmology, Mathematics and Philosophy" group.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cosmology-mathematics-and-philosophy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to