--- On Sat, 1/3/09, Martin Sewell <m.sew...@cs.ucl.ac.uk> wrote:

From: Martin Sewell <m.sew...@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: [Behavioral-Finance] Article: Darwin and the terrible games of Homo 
sapiens
To: behavioral-fina...@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, January 3, 2009, 6:12 AM






<http://blogs. ft.com/wolfforum /2009/01/ darwin-and- the-terrible- games-of- 
homo-sapiens/>

Darwin and the terrible games of Homo sapiens
January 2, 2009
by FT

By Paul Seabright

If the news that 2009 will see worldwide celebrations of Charles
Darwin's 200th birthday has passed you by, you may have spent the last
year living on Mars, or being home schooled in Kansas. Or you may just
have been hanging out with economists.

The economics profession has paid little attention to the intellectual
revolution that followed the publication of Darwin's Origin of
Species, whose 150th anniversary is also celebrated this year.

There have been, it is true, many attempts to draw analogies between
economic competition and the struggle for survival that drives natural
selection. The current crisis may even bring these back into fashion,
though the survivors of the bloodbath in banking may turn out to be
the most politically well-connected rather than the fittest in any
other sense.

But economics as a discipline, also some two centuries old, sees
little use for the insight that human beings share recent common
ancestors with the apes. Economic man crunches data like a computer,
pursuing private goals that are simply too personal to be worth
discussing.

Nowadays, behavioural economics is booming. But it is largely a
descriptive science, documenting the way man has short-sighted
preferences, or miscalculates risks.

These are conceived as flaws in the make-up of Homo economicus rather
than adapted traits in the make-up of Homo sapiens. The methods of
evolutionary biology play almost no part in behavioural economics as
it is done today.

If Darwin had been around to reflect on the financial crisis, he might
have reminded us, in his diffident way, to think of human beings not
as inadequate calculating machines, but as remarkably well-adapted apes.

As group living primates, they are intensely competitive, alert to the
narcissism of tiny differences in status, navigating their social life
through coalition formation.

The way to get ahead is to join powerful groups. The key to social
life is not unfettered competition, nor universal cooperation, but a
subtle mix of the two: competing fiercely to join up with the most
attractive cooperators. And the cognitive capacities they deploy
involve a capacity for strategic reasoning of the second, third, even
the fourth degree. You have to be impressed how well they have adapted
to life in the wild.

The problem is that many primates do not adapt well to life in zoos,
and Wall Street is the biggest and strangest zoo of them all.

It presents our large primate brain with vast challenges, of which the
greatest has been solving strategic reasoning of the thousandth degree.

Faced with evidence that a housing boom can't continue forever, we do
not unravel it back to the beginning but try to ride the boom till the
very end, to do just a little better than the very best of the others.
Those differences in status, you see.

Faced with the arithmetic certainty that a chain letter, or a Ponzi
scheme, cannot give us an expected gain, we nevertheless calculate two
or three steps ahead and give it a punt.

You know your chain letter could reach more than 15,000 readers, and
it takes only one per cent of them to reply for you to multiply your
investment 150 times. That does not seem so unlikely, does it? Yes,
actually: the maths tells us ineluctably that for every one who
multiplies the investment 150 times, another 149 get nothing at all.

Nothing. But the hard maths makes little lasting impression on the
soft porridge of the primate brain.

Instead, when the maths gets too tough we seek reassurance from the
powerful groups to which we belong. If it is okay to them that is fine
by us; the group will protect us if things go wrong. We have to trust
someone: modern life would collapse if we did everything alone.

So we trust those who seem most like us, which means we trust the
folks they trust, and so on in another long chain that stretches our
strategic reasoning capacities to the limit.

The big surprise of the last three months to economists has been that
professional investors behave with as much of a group instinct as
retail investors.

But it would not have surprised Darwin: professional investors are
just another primate population. If you want to change their behaviour
you have to change the way it feeds back not just into their pay
packets, but into the status competition and coalition formation in
their chosen peer-group.

Though Darwin's name is often wrongly associated with admiration for
the outcomes of natural selection, the man who wrote "what a book a
devil's chaplain might write on the clumsy, wasteful, blundering, low,
and horribly cruel work of nature!" would doubtless have been less
than surprised at the kinds of terrible games Homo sapiens gets up to
when he spends too much of his time in the zoo.

Paul Seabright is professor of economics at the University of Toulouse I

__._,_.___ 
Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic 
Messages | Files | Photos 
you may unsubscribe by sending an email to 

behavioral-finance-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


MARKETPLACE



>From kitchen basics to easy recipes - join the Group from Kraft Foods 
 
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to 
Traditional 
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe 



Recent Activity


 5
New MembersVisit Your Group 


Yahoo! News
Get it all here
Breaking news to
entertainment news

Yahoo! Finance
It's Now Personal
Guides, news,
advice & more.

New business?
Get new customers.
List your web site
in Yahoo! Search.
.. 
__,_._,___ 














      
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cosmology, Mathematics and Philosophy" group.
To post to this group, send email to 
cosmology-mathematics-and-philosophy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
cosmology-mathematics-and-philosophy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cosmology-mathematics-and-philosophy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to