Johs ;-) On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Johs. E <j...@b2w.com> wrote:
> Ermouth, > “Futon+” as a demonstration of the ddoc potential for apps without the > dependence of a framework like React is a good idea. > If it could be a “pure javascript” effort that demonstrates the ddoc > potential it is a really really good idea. > Do you have any ideas for how to organise confounding for speedy > completion? > Johs > > > On 20 Aug 2017, at 14:07, ermouth <ermo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Seems that Fauxton experiencing some troubles with React unfriendly > > licensing. It‘s a pity taking in account CouchDB 2 moved to fairly stable > > state, and Fauxton itself received a lot of great improvements since last > > year. > > > > However, in new circumstances, what do you think about re-creating > > something like Futon+ (for Couch 2) as a single ddoc? So you copy > > open-sourced ddoc json to any DB, run index.html attachment from the > ddoc – > > and you‘re in. > > > > Basically, the idea is to re-create Futon-like app as a couchapp. > > > > If an idea is reasonable, is it reasonable to make the process openly > > funded in some way, to make it more rapid and controllable? > > > > ermouth > >
