> > Following on from "Document Bits", would it be sensible to reserve > > *all* path segments beginning with an underscore for CouchDB's use? > > > > This is worth at least thinking about. Having the _attachments path > would open the door to an attachments index view, as well as > attachments with literal '/' in the name. > > What do people think of the _attachment path as a way out of the %2F > dilemma?
Seems like a logical way out of the dilemma, and as Matt pointed out it leaves more room for extension points. Plus, I remember some discussion about rewrite rules on the roadmap -- those that think _attachments is too ugly for their app would eventually be able to rewrite them away.
