Hello! I was reading through the thread carefully and still I can not get any strong view on what is the supposed production speed of building index with CouchDB ? My own experience was far away from satisfactory. Is there any sample timing that should be taken as a must for current version of CouchDB? Except those Damien mentioned about several messages before.
2008/7/3, Jan Lehnardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Jul 3, 2008, at 00:28, Chris Anderson wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> I'd have to go back and double check, but off the top of my head 25 >>> min for 300K docs seems about like what I was getting. Ie, not orders >>> of magnitude slower or anything. >>> >> >> >> Once upon a time there was a feature to return the available results >> of a view, even while generation is still occurring. The feature has >> fallen by the wayside, and it would be non-trivial to turn it back on, >> according to Damien on IRC. Maybe if it would be useful to enough >> people, we'll see it again. >> > > 'tis strange, the Damien I talked to on AIM a few nights back said > it would be easy to allow update=false-view queries to be non-blocking > and returning the then current (before the update) view data. > > Damien? :) > > It would be nice if we can have that. > > Cheers > Jan > -- > > -- С уважением, Сергей.
