There is also "Thinking in Erlang":
http://www.google.com/search?q=thinking%20in%20erlang

Cheers
Jan
--
On Jul 29, 2008, at 00:17, Dean Landolt wrote:

First I'd say I probably ought to learn Erlang. Anybody have any good
tutorials/resources for a complete virgin? I really don't have the time for
this, but what can you do -- it's inevitable I, guess -- why fight it?


On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >wrote:

Not sure on feasibility, but what would you say to making an erlang
function that would parse and do the boolean logic on the index? I
mean its kinda hackish, but it seems like it could be done fairly
easily. Also, it could be the basis for work on merging indeces.

Paul

On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Dean Landolt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I updated http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/FullTextIndexWithView with a slightly more robust implementation. Still no boolean abilities though -- I'm coming the internets trying to figure out how google does it in m/r,
but
my best guess is they just brute-force the merge (and probably track some stats to guess a total). This doesn't seem like something that would lend
itself easily to couch -- but I could be wrong. I'm probably wrong.
Please,
someone tell me I'm wrong...

Dean

On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Dean Landolt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

Gladly. I'll get it on the wiki and send a link after I clean it up.

Regarding merging views, something like that would be fantastic, though
I
can't really comprehend the performance implications. If a view can peer into another view for its processing, I gather this would mean it would
have
to be updated every time a change happens in the referenced view(s), and
an
incremental update here may really mean a full update of the view in question, but I'm just guessing. Though this would allow real *joins
*and
end that whole question once and for all... :)



On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Dan Reverri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Dean,

Any chance you want to share your view code?

In regards to the query parsing, I am not sure how this will work.
Right
now
results for each term have to be pulled down to the client and merged
together. Perhaps we could add a query method to views that allow
different
key values to be combined.

A user could query a view with a set of keys and a merge function that
could
define how the key values could be combined.

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Dean Landolt <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
wrote:

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Dean Landolt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

wrote:

On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 1:08 AM, Dan Reverri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

Is it worthwhile to implement a full text indexer on top of
couchdbs
map/reduce functionality?

http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/FullTextIndexWithView



Interesting idea. There's definitely more to FTI than tokenization
alone,
but then again there's an awful lot of power in m/r and javascript
--
it
didn't take me a second to find a porter stemming algorithm in js: http://tartarus.org/~martin/PorterStemmer/js.txt<http://tartarus.org/%7Emartin/PorterStemmer/js.txt >
<http://tartarus.org/%7Emartin/PorterStemmer/js.txt>
<http://tartarus.org/%7Emartin/PorterStemmer/js.txt>
<http://tartarus.org/%7Emartin/PorterStemmer/js.txt>

I bet variable weighting would be pretty close to impossible in the
m/r
paradigm though, and probably some other features (of course, I
could
be
wrong, and when it comes to couchdb, thus far I usually am). For a
strait-up
word search, this is servicible as is. I'm going to see if I can't
figure
out how to shoehorn in some boolean features.


I gave this approach another look and I was able to get a view
together
that
did a little more (stemming, optional case-insensitivity, min length
for
tokens, better whitespace handling). I'm working on an ngram view too
and
so
far it's promising. But there's still one huge problem -- for the
life
of
me
I can't figure out a workable strategy for boolean operations that
doesn't
involve fully loading each piece of the query. Am I missing
something?
Is
something like this even possible? I know there's no way to load a
piece
of
a view from another view -- but I just can't help but really wish
there
were.







Reply via email to