>> It looks like multi key GETs / bulk_load (I got horribly confused >> following yesterday's IRC discussion) is on the horizon which will >> presumably make one of the original suggestions in this thread - a >> simple join document - feasible. > > I am sure that people will start throwing rotten fruit at me for my endless > harping on about this - but that's not a JOIN.
heh, not from me, I think pedantry is underrated :) I do realise it's not a JOIN, but nonetheless, 'join document' doesn't seem like an inappropriate name for such a document - as long as we're all clear that it doesn't imply a join as known in SQL land.
