Apparently  My post to this subject didn't get to the list.  No big deal tho, since most of my subject matter got here from others on the list.  Couple of points though. 
 
Re-builders nearly always get the cylinder bore taper wrong.  Unless the taper is correct, (tighter at the top) the cylinder will not be completely the same diametrically, from top to bottom when hot.  This condition will cause premature cylinder wear, uneven heat disbursement , cracked cylinders, broken rings, etc.  And because of the competition between the three major suppliers, ie: ECI, Superior ( probably the largest) and the O.E.M's Continental and Lycoming, the price difference between re-worked and new is much closer, Making "new" the way to go from all points of consideration.  Also, from the standpoint of re-built engines, the best buy overall for the long run is a complete cylinder package, available from all three. The package includes: Cylinders,pistons,valves,valve springs,guides,keepers,and rotators.  You're going to spend between 8 and 12,000.00 to re-build you engine, so why not do it right.  In my opinion, you generally get what you pay for.
 
Those of us that have other than Continentals, be-ware of the camshaft, the weak point of Lycoming.
When re-building ALWAYS specify a "new" cam, not re-ground.  Two reasons: The lobs need to be carburized.  This is too costly to do in the field, and is seldom done.  A tocco job is the best you can expect, and is not sufficient, causing a soft cam and premature failure.  Second, Lycoming has never published it's grinding specs. because they consider it proprietary information.  Consequently field re-workers seldom get the 'Dwell" or "duration" exactly correct, and this is a critical point to "full power" performance, and long valve life.  The point about heat treating also relates to Continentals.
 
There is so much that needs to be discussed here about re-building, that I don't have time to go into it, and you probably don't want to read.  But re-building an engine regardless of manufacturer, needs to be done without budget restraints, which I know is a pie-in-the-sky- attitude, but Lycoming for one, lists over 200 individual parts that should be replaced during overhaul.  I'm willing to bet that a significant percentage of those are not.  Whatever you do, keep cloth shop rags away from your aircraft engines internal parts. :-)
 
Ok gang, have at me!!  Sorry I got my button pressed.
Doug
 

Reply via email to