----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any
advice in this forum.]----

While i was at an FAA semanar on home built parts, he
ask if i thought my patr was as good or better than
the orignal? I said mine is a lot better. Why ? mine
is not broken. the lecture was trying to tell the A&P
they shouldent make any. If a Part breaks, I try to
fix it so it won't do it again, because I am flying it
and i don't like broken parts while i am flying. On
Cessna fuel blatters a few years back, there was an AD
writen but FAA let the Manafacture to use all of there
stock. So I Watch these important pepple Vary Close.  
Joe NM

--- jan zanutto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm
> before following any advice in this forum.]----
> 
> I think there was a day when common sense ruled, but
> now the FAA is
> introducing FAR part 3 (I think it's 3)  and is in
> the NPRM stage. It
> sets the guidelines for the criminal prosecution and
> heavy penalties/jail
> time for those who dont "follow the FARs". 
> 
> It is going to get harder to find people who will
> let common sense guide
> them with that kind of pressure looming over their
> heads.
> 
> jan zanutto
> fresno, ca
> 
> On Thu, 02 Nov 2000 10:40:50 -0800 Bob Saville
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ----[Please read
> http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following
> 
> > any advice in this forum.]----
> > 
> > Hi Dick,
> >     Safety is one thing, common sense is another. 
> Unfortunately the 
> > common denominator seems to usually
> > be MONEY.
> >     Is there another IA in the area who believes
> in safety but has a 
> > little better perspective of the
> > other two legs of the triangel?
> > 
> > Bob Saville
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Dick Chevalier wrote:
> > 
> > > ----[Please read
> http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before 
> > following any advice in this forum.]----
> > >
> > > Just when you thought this thread was over...
> > >
> > > I am still in the throws of an annual on my
> Cardinal.  Seems that 
> > a steel
> > > bushing in the tail that helps hold the
> stabilator on was at one 
> > time
> > > replaced with an owner produced, slightly
> oversized part.  It was 
> > sloppy
> > > around the bolt.  The bolt passes through two
> ball bearing races 
> > in the stab
> > > and then through this bushing against which the
> inner race of the 
> > inner
> > > bearing bears and is torqued.  Obviously the
> aluminum skin 
> > wouldn't be able
> > > to take the pressure.
> > >
> > > The IA won't allow me to use a replacement
> oversized bushing, 
> > beautifully
> > > machined by my neighbor.  He insists that a
> slightly oversized 
> > (.060)
> > > bushing is not an "approved" repair.  He also
> insists that you 
> > can't owner
> > > produce a part without knowing EXACTLY what kind
> of steel and 
> > plating were
> > > used by the mfg. to make the original.  By the
> time the "support 
> > bracket" is
> > > replaced with a used one and labor is added in
> this will cost me 
> > around
> > > $500.
> > >
> > > I am of the opinion that the replacement of the
> original bushing 
> > with one of
> > > ANY
> > > material of similar hardness, even if slightly
> larger, 
> > accomplishes the
> > > purpose intended for the part I.E. something for
> the inner bearing 
> > race to
> > > be tightened against that will spread the
> loading into the 
> > aluminum skin,
> > > and over a larger surface area.  Aparently so do
> a number of people 
> > since
> > > this is a fairly common method of repair among
> other owners and 
> > was already
> > > done once to mine and entered into the logbook. 
> It is even 
> > arguable that
> > > slightly larger is slightly better since the
> contact area is 
> > greater, and
> > > since it is a bushing not a bearing the material
> hardness is not 
> > critical.
> > > It certainly would be no less safe!
> > >
> > > Here is the point.  I expect an IA to apply
> frugality and common 
> > sense to a
> > > repair.  Mine would rather cover his ass with my
> money.
> > >
> > > Dick in NM (and stuck there)
> > >
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > To unsubscribe from this list please send 
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
>
___________________________________________________________
> > > T O P I C A  The Email You Want.
> http://www.topica.com/t/16
> > > Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your
> Favorite Topics
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe from this list please send 
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> >
>
___________________________________________________________
> > T O P I C A  The Email You Want.
> http://www.topica.com/t/16
> > Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite
> Topics
> > 
> > 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe from this list please send
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>
___________________________________________________________
> T O P I C A  The Email You Want.
> http://www.topica.com/t/16
> Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite
> Topics
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
>From homework help to love advice, Yahoo! Experts has your answer.
http://experts.yahoo.com/

__________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from this list please send
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___________________________________________________________
T O P I C A  The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to