----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following any
advice in this forum.]----

Georgia,
    I have to endorse what Percey said.  There isn't a 172 flying that I'd
trade my coupe for.
    Now, having said that, is that common sense or sentimentallity for my
coupe?  The 172 is worth mor
$$$(and cost more $$$ to fly and maintain), it goes a little faster (for
more gph), etc, etc, etc......
    The only (IMHO) thing better aout it is the fact that it has a back
seat. If I wanted to take you
and Gary for a ride, I'd have to make two trips.
    Hmmmmm, so what's wrong with that, I get to go twice!!!


Bob

Percy Wood wrote:

> ----[Please read http://ercoupers.com/disclaimer.htm before following
any advice in this forum.]----
>
> At 08:29 PM 12/5/00 -0800, you wrote:
> >Hi Guys,
> >
> >I know that I don't know much and you know that I love coupes, but I'm
> >also rather attached to my training plane.  Greg has badmouthed
Skyhawks
> >before, calling them bathtubs and now clanky!  They do have their good
> >points.
>
> And there are 'coupe biggots' too, Georgia.
> The Cessna 172, short of a Sidewinder, does not come apart in the air.
They
> are the "station wagon" of general aviation.
>    Remember, "sticks and stones..."  You're up in the air, and the
throwers
> thereof may not be.
>            Percy in Portland
>
> __________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe from this list please send
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> T O P I C A  http://www.topica.com/t/17
> Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics

__________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from this list please send
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___________________________________________________________
T O P I C A  http://www.topica.com/t/17
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics

<<attachment: winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to