On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 08:09:26PM -0400, Marc Lindahl wrote: > Doesn't the authdaemond check against each module in order (i.e. from top > down in the list in webadmin)? Because, I tried changing the order - > putting authpam at the top and it still gives the same message in the log.
Authpam definitely will not handle CRAM-MD5. > I'm using only system accounts, nothing virtual. And, as I said, the other > services are validating - why would smtp differ? Because you are requesting CRAM-MD5 authentication via SMTP, and a regular userid/password authentication via other means. As I already said, CRAM-MD5 requires cleartext passwords, which not every authentication module implements. > > Sam Varshavchik writes: > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 03:40:29AM -0400, Marc Lindahl wrote: > >> The only appearance in the log is: > >> > >> > >> Apr 19 03:30:37 dell courieresmtpd: started,ip=[::ffff:216.254.71.21] > >> Apr 19 03:30:37 dell courieresmtpd: > >> error,relay=::ffff:216.254.71.21,msg="535 Authentication failed.",cmd: AUTH > >> CRAM-MD5 > >> > >> And the order of auth modules is authcram, authuserdb, authpam, authcustom - > >> the user is a system user, everything's pretty standard... > > > > CRAM-MD5 authentication requires a specific password validation configuration. > > The passwords must be stored in the clear, not encrypted. See INSTALL. More > > than likely your password scheme does not use cleartext password, and > > therefore you cannot use CRAM-MD5. > > > > -- > > Sam > > > > _______________________________________________ > > courier-users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users > -- Sam _______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users
